The engagement ladder.
The engagement model takes organisations from first discovery to enforced, continuously governed production — progressing only as far along the ladder as each organisation needs. The governance layer is evaluated against reachable operational risk, not model quality or benchmark performance.
Free Discovery / Questionnaire Review
Establish fit and high-level risk context.
Paid Discovery Workshop™
Structured scoping before audit, pilot, or integration.
Runtime Governance Audit
Identify catastrophic trajectory exposure and governance gaps.
Enterprise Runtime Governance Assessment™
Comprehensive governance assessment across enterprise workflows, environments, controls, and evidence requirements.
Limited Pilot™
Validate governance against real workflows and operational environments.
Enterprise Integration™
One-time production deployment into operational systems.
Annual Runtime Governance™ License™
Ongoing runtime governance, monitoring, updates, support, and revalidation.
Advisory Retainer™
Ongoing governance evolution, validation, and oversight.
Executive Governance Partnership™
Executive-level governance leadership beyond operational support.
Fractional Chief AI Officer (CAIO) / Executive AI Governance Lead™
Executive AI strategy, deployment governance, operational assurance, and executive risk oversight.
Frontier AI Strategic Partnership™
Strategic governance for frontier, foundation-model, infrastructure, and sovereign AI programmes.
The “+” denotes that figures are not ceilings. Engagement scale rises with deployment size, risk surface, compliance burden, number of agents and environments, downstream impact, and commercial structure. Scale is qualified by the assessment questionnaire — customer reach, industry, agent maturity, governance maturity, compliance requirements, multi-agent complexity, and partner intent.
ℛ(t) ∩ Ω = ∅
The objective remains unchanged. But Ω must remain aligned with the client’s evolving environment — as systems, tools, models, regulations, and attack surfaces change. Ω governance is the continuous work of reviewing and updating the definition of forbidden states, validating that runtime constraints still reflect operational reality, and ensuring no new reachable trajectories have emerged through system updates, new tools, model changes, workflow changes, or regulatory requirements.
Included across engagements — Runtime Governance Executive Reports™Every Pilot, Integration, Annual Runtime Governance Licence™, and Managed Governance Partner™ engagement includes board-ready evidence: what was protected, what was prevented, what changed, and recommended next actions. The API protects the system; the report proves the value. See what a report contains →
Start from your situation.
Match where you are today to the recommended entry point. Every pathway can progress to the next rung of the ladder.
Enterprise Runtime Governance Assessment™
We reduce uncertainty before deployment by identifying catastrophic trajectories, producing executive evidence, and recommending governance actions.
The broader-scope engagement for organisations running multiple agents across connected systems. Where the 48-Hour Runtime Governance Audit measures a single environment, the Enterprise Assessment maps reachable Ω exposure across your multi-agent architecture, produces board-ready evidence, and hands you a concrete governance roadmap and integration blueprint — delivered with executive and technical stakeholders in the room.
Review & analysis
Executive deliverables & sessions
Indicative engagement scales only. Final commercial terms are determined following assessment and deployment review. The “+” symbol denotes that figures are not ceilings.
- The Runtime Governance Audit measures exposure in a single environment, fast.
- The Enterprise Runtime Governance Assessment extends that across a multi-agent, cross-system estate with board-ready evidence, a governance roadmap, and an integration blueprint.
- The Limited Pilot validates Runtime Governance against real workflows in the client environment.
- Enterprise Integration deploys governance into production.
Paid Discovery Workshop™
For teams that need structured scoping before an audit, pilot, or integration.
This workshop goes deeper than a discovery call. We review the organisation’s agent architecture, tool inventory, data flows, compliance requirements, multi-agent interactions, existing controls, and deployment plans.
What we review
Deliverables
Indicative engagement scales only. Final commercial terms are determined following assessment and deployment review. The “+” symbol denotes that figures are not ceilings.
- Free Discovery / Questionnaire Review establishes fit and high-level risk context.
- The Paid Discovery Workshop defines the scope.
- The Runtime Governance Audit measures exposure.
- The Enterprise Runtime Governance Assessment extends this across a multi-agent, cross-system estate with board-ready evidence.
- The Limited Pilot validates Runtime Governance in the client environment.
- Enterprise Integration deploys governance into production.
- The Annual Runtime Governance™ License sustains governance — monitoring, updates, support, and revalidation.
- The Advisory Retainer provides ongoing governance evolution, validation, and oversight.
The workshop is optional and never mandatory. The questionnaire remains the primary qualification mechanism — if sufficient information is already available, we can move directly into an Audit, Pilot, or Integration discussion. In some cases, Resurrection Tech may recommend exactly that.
Governance leadership beyond operational support.
For organisations that need executive-level governance leadership — from ongoing partnership to part-time executive AI leadership and strategic programmes for frontier and sovereign AI.
Executive Governance Partnership™
Executive-level governance leadership beyond operational support.
Fractional Chief AI Officer (CAIO) / Executive AI Governance Lead™
Part-time executive leadership for organisations requiring ongoing AI strategy, deployment governance, executive decision support, and governance programme leadership without appointing a full-time Chief AI Officer.
- Executive AI strategy and operating-model design
- AI deployment governance and approval frameworks
- Executive and board risk reviews
- Regulatory and assurance engagement support
- Governance programme leadership
- Cross-functional decision rights and accountability
Frontier AI Strategic Partnership™
Strategic governance engagement for frontier AI labs, foundation model providers, AI infrastructure platforms, autonomous agent platforms, and sovereign AI programmes. Scope may include model-release governance, safety-operations integration, runtime deployment controls, planner validation, strategic roadmap development, and executive governance.
Bring Runtime Governance to your own customers.
For firms that want to package, resell, embed, or distribute Runtime Governance — not only deploy it internally. Commercial terms are set by assessment, not fixed public pricing.
Partner Discovery Workshop™
For prospective partners scoping a relationship before committing to a channel pathway.
Strategic Alliance Partner™
Advisors, consultants, introducers, and strategic relationships — qualified enterprise introductions and strategic market access.
Managed Governance Partner™ Onboarding
Prepares an MSSP, consultancy, or assurance firm to confidently sell and deliver Runtime Governance — architecture review, deployment planning, sales enablement, and co-branded material. Strategic onboarding, not a discount.
Managed Governance Partner™
Runtime Governance packaged into MSP, MSSP, cybersecurity, compliance, or AI assurance services — ongoing.
Embedded Runtime Governance Licensing™
Runtime Governance embedded into platforms, products, or customer-facing AI infrastructure.
OEM / Enterprise Licensing™
Large-scale, sovereign, or white-label embedded licensing.
Selecting a partner, channel, or licensing option in the Runtime Governance Assessment routes you to the matching pathway. Pricing for these motions is partnership-dependent and confirmed after a commercial review.
Partners license Runtime Governance infrastructure, evidence, deployment support, monitoring, updates, and commercial rights — not unrestricted raw code. Integration is available as a hosted API, a private deployment, or embedded under licence, and Resurrection Tech retains ownership of the governance engine. See how integration works →
Licensing & OEM terms.Embedded and OEM licensing — including white-label, exclusivity, and territory rights — is determined during partnership discovery. Self-hosted and embedded deployments scale above hosted equivalents. Usage reporting and audit rights are retained. “Powered by Resurrection Tech™” attribution applies unless white-label rights are separately licensed. Exclusivity is never automatic and is granted only against a minimum annual guarantee, time-boxed, and carved out for direct and named accounts. Deal registration and named-account exclusions apply.
Indicative engagement scales only. Final commercial terms are determined following assessment and deployment review. The “+” symbol denotes that figures are not ceilings.
Priced against the cost of Ω becoming reachable.
Commercial terms are determined by the operational and governance burden of the deployment, not by software effort alone. Pricing is proportional to consequence, not to effort.
Proportional to
Not
The governance layer is priced against the cost of catastrophic risk becoming reachable, not against the complexity of the software itself. Organisations may enter through Free Discovery, a Paid Discovery Workshop, a Runtime Governance Audit, an Enterprise Runtime Governance Assessment™, or a Limited Pilot™, depending on maturity, validation requirements, and existing understanding of their risk landscape. Production governance is sustained through Enterprise Integration and the Annual Runtime Governance™ License; executive involvement is available through the advisory pathways above. All figures are indicative and non-binding; final commercial terms follow assessment, deployment review, and commercial qualification.
One pathway. Every customer. Repeatable.
The same seven steps take any organisation from first assessment to enforced, monthly-reported governance — a familiar SaaS motion that inserts one layer and replaces nothing.
Runtime Assessment
48 hoursYour current architecture, deployment model, and reachable risks — assessed in 48 hours, with a recommended pathway.
Discovery
PreparedWe arrive already briefed on your models, tools, autonomy level, and regulatory context — a working session, not an exploration.
API Credentials
Familiar SaaSAn API key, an endpoint, and documentation. A familiar SaaS integration your team already understands.
Shadow Mode
Insert one layerInsert one layer; replace nothing. Governance observes every trajectory in production without touching a single existing tool.
BeforeLLM / AgentToolsProductionAfterLLM / AgentRuntime GovernanceALLOW · ESCALATE · BLOCKToolsProductionEvidence Report
Your environmentEvery decision, blocked trajectory, false positive, latency figure, and audit-log entry — evidence gathered inside your own environment.
Enable Enforcement
One config changeObserve-only becomes observe-and-enforce with one configuration change. No agent rebuild, no redeployment.
Monthly Reporting
Standing roleOngoing governance evidence, renewals, and executive visibility — governance as a standing operational role.
Audit
Pilot
Integration
Retainer
The financial asymmetry of one unsafe execution.
Governance cost is bounded. Catastrophic exposure is not. The figures below weigh the cost of a Runtime Governance engagement against the documented cost of Ω becoming reachable.
If one catastrophic execution is prevented, governance pays for itself many times over — eliminating exposure thousands of times larger than deployment cost.
We do not price according to software complexity. We price according to the cost of Ω becoming reachable.
| Scenario | Potential exposure | Governance comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 48-Hour Audit | £40K–£75K | Entry assessment |
| Annual Retainer | £420K–£1.2M/yr | Continuous assurance |
| Healthcare breach | £7.7M | ~103× audit cost |
| Credential exposure | £10.22M | ~136× audit cost |
| GDPR fine | £530M | ~7,067× audit cost |
| Major funds transfer | £2B+ | ~26,666× audit cost |
Illustrative risk-comparison figures — not guaranteed savings. Exposure values reference documented industry incidents and regulatory maxima; comparisons use a £75K audit baseline.
Indicative engagement scales only. Final commercial terms are determined following assessment and deployment review. The “+” symbol denotes that figures are not ceilings.
One prevented event can pay for years of governance.
The audit identifies which catastrophic states are reachable in your system today — and moves Ω out of reach before it executes.
See the decision before the action.
The governance layer evaluates executable trajectories before tool execution. Unsafe futures are blocked before they occur. Safe workflows continue uninterrupted.
- Safe workflows continue
- Unsafe trajectories intercepted
- Governance occurs before execution
- Objective maintained
Book a consultation.
Move from pathways to a conversation. Pick the session that matches where you are — discovery, a runtime safety assessment, or an enterprise governance strategy session.
Discovery Call
A short introductory call to discuss your AI governance needs and determine whether Resurrection Tech is a good fit.
Paid Discovery Workshop™
An optional, structured scoping engagement before an Audit, Pilot, or Integration. The questionnaire remains the primary qualification — skip the workshop if it already provides enough. We map your agent architecture, tool exposure, data flows, compliance requirements, and governance readiness, then recommend a pathway. Typical range: £5K–£50K+ (invoice-only).
Runtime Safety Assessment
A structured assessment for organisations exploring runtime safety, AI governance, agent risk, and reachability-based control.
Enterprise AI Governance Strategy Session
A deeper strategy session for leadership teams, AI program managers, and technical stakeholders exploring enterprise AI governance and pilot opportunities.